No Winners Today

That’s right, at least in the presidential race – NO WINNER. Why? Because it doesn’t matter who wins the race too many people will not be happy. Everything the new president does will be scrutinized like never before. Every negative event affecting Americans will be blamed on the president whether it’s their fault or our own. For me – I voted for the guy who I feel will handle the hot seat the best. I have never spent so much time reading and searching the issues. I feel good about all of my choices today. I hope you all do too. I also have to say that just because my choices might differ from yours doesn’t mean I want to argue or debate. It does no good. We all get to choose for ourselves and I respect differences of opinions until someone doesn’t respect mine. I don’t know how many people have honestly enjoyed this political season (aside from the great comic relief on SNL). I would love to see paranoia disappear and bitter and hateful commentary cease. That would require a miracle. I will be glad to just move beyond this phase, see the yard art disappear and then wait and see. I hope for positive change but let’s all be realistic. Changes for the better will not happen overnight.

Science and Politics [/\/ick]

I've been reading a book called "Corrupted Science" by John Grant (2007). As a scientist, I read things like this to keep me on my toes, and to remind me to be honest when I interpret the results of experiments. Corrupted science often happens when scientists let their humanity overcome their objectivity. It can happen to any scientist who is not careful.

The last chapter, titled "The political corruption of science", begins with the following paragraph:

"Since the dawn of the 20th century, there has been an upsurge in the ideological corruption of science by those in political power. the three classic cases over the past century are Hitler's Germany, Stalin's USSR, and George W. Bush's America.The third of these is treated in slightly more detail here not just because it is current but because its ideological spread has arguably been on the widest scale, affecting not one or two sciences but many. It is also, because of its assault on climate science, potentially the most globally dangerous in human history. This should not be read as reflective of any political attitude the author might have for or against other activities of the Bush Administration; the deliberate governmental corruption of a nation's science is of such parlous importance that it transcends all political allegiances or antipathies."

Mr. Grant has said what I feel in a most concise way. While some may claim that comparing the US with Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union is spurious, when viewed purely from the viewpoint of scientific corruption, the comparison holds. Suppression of real scientific results or promotion of pseudoscience to serve political or ideological ends is the common thread. Scientific truth is not determined by elections, but by facts. Science is not democratic. Two diametrically opposed theories cannot both be true, and scientists do not vote on which one to accept. Experiments are performed, data is analyzed and interpreted and results are presented. Eventually incorrect theories are discarded and the truth which was always there is discovered.

Keep science free.